<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech Talk for Monday November 9th 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/</link>
	<description>Completely free seasonality, fundamental and technical analysis of the stock markets from a certified market leader.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-17026</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/#comment-17026</guid>
		<description>Mr. Vialoux
I have a question about the declining volume on the TSX and as well the American Indices. Does the volume from ETF&#039;s get added to the indexes? For example if HOU has a volume of 10 million will that volume be added to the TSX volume? Today I caught just the tail end of a guest on BNN and if I heard correctly he attributed the declining volume to more and more investors using ETF&#039;s rather than stocks. That statement led me to believe that the volume is not added to the TSX. Your comments are greatly appreciated.
Donna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Vialoux<br />
I have a question about the declining volume on the TSX and as well the American Indices. Does the volume from ETF&#8217;s get added to the indexes? For example if HOU has a volume of 10 million will that volume be added to the TSX volume? Today I caught just the tail end of a guest on BNN and if I heard correctly he attributed the declining volume to more and more investors using ETF&#8217;s rather than stocks. That statement led me to believe that the volume is not added to the TSX. Your comments are greatly appreciated.<br />
Donna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Vialoux</title>
		<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-17025</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Vialoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/#comment-17025</guid>
		<description>Hi Mills. The charts will let us know. Short term technicals and seasonality currently are favourable, but chances of a deterioration in short term technicals for at least a short period of time between now and year end are high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mills. The charts will let us know. Short term technicals and seasonality currently are favourable, but chances of a deterioration in short term technicals for at least a short period of time between now and year end are high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Vialoux</title>
		<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-17024</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Vialoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/#comment-17024</guid>
		<description>Hi Ken. My trend line for the Transportation Average in today&#039;s Tech Talk is slightly misleading. Actual trend for the Average is neutral (i.e. a break to a 2009 high but a recent break below support. Short term technicals have turned positive (i.e. uptrending Stochastics and RSI as well as a move today above its 50 day moving average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ken. My trend line for the Transportation Average in today&#8217;s Tech Talk is slightly misleading. Actual trend for the Average is neutral (i.e. a break to a 2009 high but a recent break below support. Short term technicals have turned positive (i.e. uptrending Stochastics and RSI as well as a move today above its 50 day moving average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Vialoux</title>
		<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-17023</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Vialoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/#comment-17023</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff. Investing in U.S. equity ETFs includes significant downside currency risk for the average investor. A possible solution will be revealed by Bay Street shortly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff. Investing in U.S. equity ETFs includes significant downside currency risk for the average investor. A possible solution will be revealed by Bay Street shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Vialoux</title>
		<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-17022</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Vialoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/#comment-17022</guid>
		<description>Hi Huy. A head and shoulders pattern by the S&amp;P 500 is not clearly defined yet. A move by the S&amp;P 500 to a new 2009 high (possibly as soon as tomorrow)would eliminate the possibility of the pattern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Huy. A head and shoulders pattern by the S&amp;P 500 is not clearly defined yet. A move by the S&amp;P 500 to a new 2009 high (possibly as soon as tomorrow)would eliminate the possibility of the pattern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Vialoux</title>
		<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-17021</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Vialoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/#comment-17021</guid>
		<description>Hi Roy. AAPL currently has a more positive intermediate technical profile than RIMM. However, don&#039;t give up on RIMM. Short term technical indicators (Stochastics, RSI)turned positive today. Seasonal influences are positive for both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roy. AAPL currently has a more positive intermediate technical profile than RIMM. However, don&#8217;t give up on RIMM. Short term technical indicators (Stochastics, RSI)turned positive today. Seasonal influences are positive for both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Vialoux</title>
		<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-17020</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Vialoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/#comment-17020</guid>
		<description>Hi Chrispycrunch. The comment in Saturday&#039;s Financial Post and on this site today was far from a ringing endorsement. Looking for a relatively short term trade as analyst come out with favourable comments and as short term technicals recover from oversold levels. The National Bank analyst was the first to offer comments on fourth quarter expectations in a report released today. His comments were one of the reasons for the spike in the Canadian Financial Services sector today. Short term technicals continue to improve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chrispycrunch. The comment in Saturday&#8217;s Financial Post and on this site today was far from a ringing endorsement. Looking for a relatively short term trade as analyst come out with favourable comments and as short term technicals recover from oversold levels. The National Bank analyst was the first to offer comments on fourth quarter expectations in a report released today. His comments were one of the reasons for the spike in the Canadian Financial Services sector today. Short term technicals continue to improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Vialoux</title>
		<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-17019</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Vialoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/#comment-17019</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrea. A seasonality study on uranium has not been possible to date because a public index showing data for at least 10 years is not available. Closest we have is seasonality on Cameco. Its period of seasonal strength is from the end of October to the end of May with a sweet spot between the end of January to the end of May.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrea. A seasonality study on uranium has not been possible to date because a public index showing data for at least 10 years is not available. Closest we have is seasonality on Cameco. Its period of seasonal strength is from the end of October to the end of May with a sweet spot between the end of January to the end of May.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-17013</link>
		<dc:creator>Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/#comment-17013</guid>
		<description>Hi Don,

do you see a pullback between now and end of year ??

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Don,</p>
<p>do you see a pullback between now and end of year ??</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-17010</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timingthemarket.ca/techtalk/2009/11/09/tech-talk-for-monday-november-9th-2009/#comment-17010</guid>
		<description>Good morning Don,

Can you please explain your  intermediate trend analysis? I have noticed similar comments on the different charts but I am going to use the Transports as an example. There was a lower closing low and the trend line drawn from the Mar low through July low and early Oct low broken. Chart reading is so different to different people and I would just like to know how you interpret them in your analysis?

Thanks,

Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning Don,</p>
<p>Can you please explain your  intermediate trend analysis? I have noticed similar comments on the different charts but I am going to use the Transports as an example. There was a lower closing low and the trend line drawn from the Mar low through July low and early Oct low broken. Chart reading is so different to different people and I would just like to know how you interpret them in your analysis?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

